The questions partners actually ask.

Issuer audits under PCAOB standards, including first-time engagements and multi-year catch-ups, with statements under US GAAP or IFRS. It works best where the evidence is transactional and the records are digital: bank and cash, receivables and payables, revenue, payroll, fixed assets, accruals, intercompany elimination, and building the trial balance and statements.

On judgment-heavy areas like fair value or going concern, Linden pulls the inputs together and your team does the thinking.

Audit software organizes the engagement. Outsourcing adds hands. Neither changes the work itself: you still build each engagement from scratch, and the cost still tracks the hours.

Linden is an agentic system. The workflow carries into your next engagement and improves there instead of resetting. Every figure keeps the document it came from, and the review trail comes with the work rather than being rebuilt afterwards.

No. Your audit software stays the system of record and your templates stay your templates. We configure around your methodology and your review structure, start with one workflow on one engagement, and you do not need to put engineers on it.

We are not an audit firm and we do not hold audit engagements. When a company comes to us, we introduce them to a licensed partner firm that contracts with them directly. With a flagship partner we go to market together, and those clients are that firm's clients.

Work with us as a platform or enterprise partner and your clients stay yours: your relationship, your brand, your engagement letter. We write the channel protections into the agreement, and you can export your complete engagement record whenever you want.

No technology can guarantee the outcome of a PCAOB inspection. What it can do is make the work reproducible, and that is what Linden is built for. Any figure in the file traces back to the document it came from and the step that produced it, with the review and approval history attached.

Nothing becomes final in your file on our say-so. Our work is a draft until your reviewer signs it off.

Your quality management system has to assess us as a service provider. We arrive with the control descriptions, audit logs and subprocessor list that assessment asks for, so it is not work you have to invent.

It stays yours. We use engagement data only to run the work you contracted, never to train models that serve anyone else. Access on our side is least-privilege and logged.

Before anything goes live you get the model providers, subprocessors, storage locations and retention periods to review. If we stop working together, we hand back or delete on your schedule.